On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:27:28PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > --- gcc/cp/constexpr.cc.jj 2022-06-08 08:21:02.973448193 +0200
> > +++ gcc/cp/constexpr.cc 2022-06-08 17:13:04.986040449 +0200
> > @@ -5707,6 +5707,20 @@ cxx_eval_store_expression (const constex
> > }
> > break;
> >
On 6/9/22 04:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
We claim we support P0415R1 (constexpr complex), but e.g.
#include
constexpr bool
foo ()
{
std::complex a (1.0, 2.0);
a += 3.0;
a.real (6.0);
return a.real () == 6.0 && a.imag () == 2.0;
}
static_assert (foo ());
fails with
test.C:12:20:
Hi!
We claim we support P0415R1 (constexpr complex), but e.g.
#include
constexpr bool
foo ()
{
std::complex a (1.0, 2.0);
a += 3.0;
a.real (6.0);
return a.real () == 6.0 && a.imag () == 2.0;
}
static_assert (foo ());
fails with
test.C:12:20: error: non-constant condition for static ass
