Re: [PATCH] c++: Diagnose or avoid constexpr dtors in classes with virtual bases [PR114426]

On 4/12/24 09:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! I had another look at this P1 PR today. You said in the "c++: fix in-charge parm in constexpr" mail back in December (as well as in the r14-6507 commit message): "Since a class with vbases can't have constexpr 'tors there isn't actually a need for an

[PATCH] c++: Diagnose or avoid constexpr dtors in classes with virtual bases [PR114426]

Hi! I had another look at this P1 PR today. You said in the "c++: fix in-charge parm in constexpr" mail back in December (as well as in the r14-6507 commit message): "Since a class with vbases can't have constexpr 'tors there isn't actually a need for an in-charge parameter in a destructor" but