On 6/7/22 14:25, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/22/22 14:31, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here we're neglecting to clear cp_unevaluated_operand when substituting
into the arguments of the alias template-id skip<(T(), 0),
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/22/22 14:31, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > > Here we're neglecting to clear cp_unevaluated_operand when substituting
> > > into the arguments of the alias template-id skip<(T(), 0), T> with T=A,
> > >
On 3/22/22 14:31, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here we're neglecting to clear cp_unevaluated_operand when substituting
into the arguments of the alias template-id skip<(T(), 0), T> with T=A,
which means cp_unevaluated_operand remains set during mark_used for
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Here we're neglecting to clear cp_unevaluated_operand when substituting
> into the arguments of the alias template-id skip<(T(), 0), T> with T=A,
> which means cp_unevaluated_operand remains set during mark_used for
> A::A() and so we never synthesize
Here we're neglecting to clear cp_unevaluated_operand when substituting
into the arguments of the alias template-id skip<(T(), 0), T> with T=A,
which means cp_unevaluated_operand remains set during mark_used for
A::A() and so we never synthesize it. Later constant evaluation for
the substituted
