{ dg-message "previously defined here|old
declaration" }
| ^
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] c++: bogus warning w/ deduction guide in anon ns [PR106604]
Here we're unintentionally issuing a "declared static but never defined"
warning for a deduction guide declared in a
dg-message "previously defined here|old
declaration" }
| ^
After
src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction74.C:11:1: error: redefinition of
‘S()-> S’
11 | S() -> S; // { dg-error "redefinition" }
| ^
src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-de
On 8/10/23 16:40, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 8/10/23 12:09, Patrick Palka wrote:
Booststrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk and perhaps 13?
-- >8 --
We shouldn't issue a "declared static but never defined" warning
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 8/10/23 12:09, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Booststrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
> > trunk and perhaps 13?
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > We shouldn't issue a "declared static but never defined" warning
> > for a
On 8/10/23 12:09, Patrick Palka wrote:
Booststrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk and perhaps 13?
-- >8 --
We shouldn't issue a "declared static but never defined" warning
for a deduction guide (declared in an anonymous namespace).
PR c++/106604
Booststrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk and perhaps 13?
-- >8 --
We shouldn't issue a "declared static but never defined" warning
for a deduction guide (declared in an anonymous namespace).
PR c++/106604
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl.cc
