Re: [PATCH] c++: explicit inst w/ many constrained partial specs [PR104634]

2024-01-15 Thread Jason Merrill
On 1/3/24 13:49, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and perhaps 13? OK for both. -- >8 -- Here we neglect to emit the definitions of A::f2 and A::f4 despite the explicit instantiations ultimately because TREE_PUBLIC isn't set

Re: [PATCH] c++: explicit inst w/ many constrained partial specs [PR104634]

2024-01-15 Thread Patrick Palka
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 1:49 PM Patrick Palka wrote: > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK > for trunk and perhaps 13? Ping. > > -- >8 -- > > Here we neglect to emit the definitions of A::f2 and A::f4 > despite the explicit instantiations ultimately because

[PATCH] c++: explicit inst w/ many constrained partial specs [PR104634]

2024-01-03 Thread Patrick Palka
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and perhaps 13? -- >8 -- Here we neglect to emit the definitions of A::f2 and A::f4 despite the explicit instantiations ultimately because TREE_PUBLIC isn't set on the corresponding partial specializations, the