On 7/19/23 14:38, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 02:32:15PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
LGTM. It might be preferable to check COMPLETE_TYPE_P in the caller
instead, so that
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 02:32:15PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
>
> LGTM. It might be preferable to check COMPLETE_TYPE_P in the caller
> instead, so that we avoid inspecting
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
LGTM. It might be preferable to check COMPLETE_TYPE_P in the caller
instead, so that we avoid inspecting CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE on an
incomplete class type, and so that the caller doesn't
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
-- >8 --
r13-1227 added an assert checking that the index in a CONSTRUCTOR
is a FIELD_DECL. That's a reasonable assumption but in this case
we never called reshape_init due to the type being incomplete, and
so the index remained an
