On 09/04/20 17:00 -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
In C++20 this is well-formed:
using T = int[2];
T t(1, 2);
which means that std::is_constructible_v should be true.
But constructible_expr immediately returned the error_mark_node when it
saw a list with more than one element. To give accurate re
On 4/9/20 5:00 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
In C++20 this is well-formed:
using T = int[2];
T t(1, 2);
which means that std::is_constructible_v should be true.
But constructible_expr immediately returned the error_mark_node when it
saw a list with more than one element. To give accurate resu
On 09/04/20 17:00 -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
In C++20 this is well-formed:
using T = int[2];
T t(1, 2);
which means that std::is_constructible_v should be true.
But constructible_expr immediately returned the error_mark_node when it
saw a list with more than one element. To give accurate re
In C++20 this is well-formed:
using T = int[2];
T t(1, 2);
which means that std::is_constructible_v should be true.
But constructible_expr immediately returned the error_mark_node when it
saw a list with more than one element. To give accurate results in
C++20, we have to try initializing th