On 5/31/22 12:28, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here the out-of-line definition of Z::z causes duplicate_decls to
change z's type to use the implicit instantiation Z rather than the
corresponding primary template type (which is also the type of the
injected class name), and the former, being a dependent
Here the out-of-line definition of Z::z causes duplicate_decls to
change z's type to use the implicit instantiation Z rather than the
corresponding primary template type (which is also the type of the
injected class name), and the former, being a dependent specialization,
lacks a TYPE_BINFO
