On 3/23/23 11:00, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here when resolving the implicit object for '' within the
local class Foo, we expect to obtain a dummy object of type Foo& since
there's no 'this' available in this context. And yet at this point
current_class_ref still corresponds to the outer class
Here when resolving the implicit object for '' within the
local class Foo, we expect to obtain a dummy object of type Foo& since
there's no 'this' available in this context. And yet at this point
current_class_ref still corresponds to the outer class Context (and is
const), which confuses
