Re: [PATCH] c++: unifying identical tmpls from current inst [PR108347]

2023-09-16 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On 9/13/23 13:53, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? -- >8 -- Here more_specialized_partial_spec considers the two partial specializations to be unordered ultimately because unify for identical parm=arg=A::C returns failure due

[PATCH] c++: unifying identical tmpls from current inst [PR108347]

2023-09-13 Thread Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? -- >8 -- Here more_specialized_partial_spec considers the two partial specializations to be unordered ultimately because unify for identical parm=arg=A::C returns failure due to C being dependent. This patch fixes