On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 7:24 AM Rainer Orth
wrote:
>
> Hi Lewis,
>
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:16:54PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> On 12/5/23 20:52, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> >> > Hello-
> >> >
> >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
> >> >
> >> > There are two related issues
Hi Lewis,
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:16:54PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 12/5/23 20:52, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
>> > Hello-
>> >
>> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
>> >
>> > There are two related issues here really, a regression since GCC 11 where
>> > we
>> > can ICE a
On 1/31/24 21:09, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 03:18:01PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/30/24 21:49, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:16:54PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/5/23 20:52, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
Hello-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 03:18:01PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/30/24 21:49, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:16:54PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 12/5/23 20:52, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> > > > Hello-
> > > >
> > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
> >
On 1/30/24 21:49, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:16:54PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/5/23 20:52, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
Hello-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
There are two related issues here really, a regression since GCC 11 where we
can ICE after restor
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:16:54PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/5/23 20:52, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> > Hello-
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
> >
> > There are two related issues here really, a regression since GCC 11 where we
> > can ICE after restoring a PCH, and
On 12/5/23 20:52, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
Hello-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
There are two related issues here really, a regression since GCC 11 where we
can ICE after restoring a PCH, and a deeper issue with bogus locations
assigned to macros that were defined prior to resto
Hello-
May I please ping this small patch? Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/639467.html
-Lewis
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 8:02 PM Lewis Hyatt wrote:
>
> Hello-
>
> May I please ping this PCH patch? Thanks!
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/
Hello-
May I please ping this PCH patch? Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/639467.html
-Lewis
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:52 PM Lewis Hyatt wrote:
>
> Hello-
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
>
> There are two related issues here really, a regres
Hello-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
There are two related issues here really, a regression since GCC 11 where we
can ICE after restoring a PCH, and a deeper issue with bogus locations
assigned to macros that were defined prior to restoring a PCH. This patch
fixes the ICE r
10 matches
Mail list logo