On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:30 AM Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/21/21 8:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 4:04 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:51 AM Richard Biener
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:22 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> >
On 5/21/21 8:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 4:04 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:51 AM Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:22 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:33 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> O
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 4:04 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:51 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:22 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:33 AM Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:16 PM H.J. Lu wro
On 5/20/21 4:03 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:51 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:22 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:33 AM Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:16 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> When expandin
avoid_temp_mem?).
>
> That said, I wonder if we want to elide expand_constructor when the
> CTOR is TREE_STATIC && TREE_CONSTANT and !mostly_zeros_p
> and we can_move_by_pieces.
>
> So sth like
>
> diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c
> index 7139545d543..76b3bdf0c01 100644
>
