On 03/21/2017 07:39 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Martin, Richard,
> I've read up on the thread, but I'm not sure where you guys are with an
> actual patch. From what I Richard nailed it in BZ with the comment that the
> BB should not be associated with any source line. That's a new thing, so I
Martin, Richard,
I've read up on the thread, but I'm not sure where you guys are with an
actual patch. From what I Richard nailed it in BZ with the comment that
the BB should not be associated with any source line. That's a new
thing, so I think the gcov format needs extending (at least).
g
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 11:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/14/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> On 03/14/2017 11:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
On 03/14/2017 11:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 03/14/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
On 03/14/2017 11:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>
On 03/14/2017 01:33 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 03/14/2017 11:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
On 03/14/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> > /tmp/gcov-1.gcno: block
> > 2:`/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c':10,
> > 14
> > /tmp/gcov-1.gcno: block
> > 4:`/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 11:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/14/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> On 03/14/2017 11:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
On 03/14/2017 12:55 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 11:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/14/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 11:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
On 03/14/2017 11:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 03/14/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
On 03/14/2017 11:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/14/2017 11:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> On 03/14/2017 10:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
On 03/14/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 03/14/2017 11:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
On 03/14/2017 10:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 11:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/14/2017 10:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> On 03/14/2017 09:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
On 03/14/2017 11:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 03/14/2017 10:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
On 03/14/2017 09:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 10:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/14/2017 09:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> On 03/13/2017 04:16 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
On 03/14/2017 10:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 03/14/2017 09:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
On 03/13/2017 04:16 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 09:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/13/2017 04:16 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> On 03/13/2017 02:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
On 03/14/2017 09:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 03/13/2017 04:16 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
On 03/13/2017 02:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/13/2017 04:16 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/13/2017 02:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> On 03/13/2017 02:01 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
On 03/13/2017 04:16 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 03/13/2017 02:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
On 03/13/2017 02:01 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>>>
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/13/2017 02:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/13/2017 02:01 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
On 03/13/2017 02:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 03/13/2017 02:01 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As briefly discussed in the PR,
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/13/2017 02:01 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello.
> >>>
> >>> As briefly discussed in the PR, there are BB that do not correspond to a
> >>> r
On 03/13/2017 02:01 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> As briefly discussed in the PR, there are BB that do not correspond to a
>>> real
>>> line in source
>>> code. profile.c emits locations f
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > As briefly discussed in the PR, there are BB that do not correspond to a
> > real
> > line in source
> > code. profile.c emits locations for all BBs that have a gimple statement
> > belong
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As briefly discussed in the PR, there are BB that do not correspond to a real
> line in source
> code. profile.c emits locations for all BBs that have a gimple statement
> belonging to a line.
> I hope these should be marked in gcov utility an
.
Patch survives make check RUNTESTFLAGS="gcov.exp".
Thanks for review and feedback.
Martin
>From cc8738a287d5b0b98d61013ee065c96ed3e3cefa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:01:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gcov: Mark BBs that do not correspond to a line in
26 matches
Mail list logo