Am Samstag, den 29.02.2020, 10:57 +0100 schrieb Jakub Jelinek:
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 09:50:00AM +, Uecker, Martin wrote:
> > One could also simply remove the error in varasm.c. This
> > would preserve the optimization. As a side effect, this
> > would allow register without __asm__ at file
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 09:50:00AM +, Uecker, Martin wrote:
> One could also simply remove the error in varasm.c. This
> would preserve the optimization. As a side effect, this
> would allow register without __asm__ at file scope, but
> there do not seem to be any disadvantages. (register
> at
One could also simply remove the error in varasm.c. This
would preserve the optimization. As a side effect, this
would allow register without __asm__ at file scope, but
there do not seem to be any disadvantages. (register
at file scope is already diagnosed by the C FE when
using --pedantic).
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following testcase is rejected, while it was accepted in 3.4 and earlier
> (before tree-ssa merge).
> The problem is that we decide to promote the const variable to TREE_STATIC,
> but TREE_STATIC DECL_REGISTER VAR_DECLs may only be the
Hi!
The following testcase is rejected, while it was accepted in 3.4 and earlier
(before tree-ssa merge).
The problem is that we decide to promote the const variable to TREE_STATIC,
but TREE_STATIC DECL_REGISTER VAR_DECLs may only be the global register vars
and so assemble_variable/make_decl_rtl
