On targets with permissive alignment requirements GCC sometimes
lowers stores of short (between two and 16 bytes), power-of-two
char sequences to single integer stores of the corresponding
width. This happens for sequences of ordinary character stores
as well as for some calls to memcpy.
Howev
On 7/19/19 4:04 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On targets with permissive alignment requirements GCC sometimes
> lowers stores of short (between two and 16 bytes), power-of-two
> char sequences to single integer stores of the corresponding
> width. This happens for sequences of ordinary character stor
On 7/22/19 3:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 7/19/19 4:04 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On targets with permissive alignment requirements GCC sometimes
lowers stores of short (between two and 16 bytes), power-of-two
char sequences to single integer stores of the corresponding
width. This happens for seque
On 7/22/19 5:17 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Umm "store_b4_nul"? Are you really trying to save 3 characters in the
>> name by writing it this way? :-)
>
> I'm actually saving four characters over "store_before_nul" ;-)
:-)
>
> It's just a name I picked because I like it. Would you prefer to
>
On 7/24/19 11:06 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 7/22/19 5:17 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Umm "store_b4_nul"? Are you really trying to save 3 characters in the
name by writing it this way? :-)
I'm actually saving four characters over "store_before_nul" ;-)
:-)
It's just a name I picked because I lik
Committed in r273783 after retesting and including a test for
the warning that I had left out of the patch I posted here.
Martin
PS I suspect some of the tests I added might need tweaking on
big-endian systems. I'll deal with them tomorrow.
And maybe also strictly aligned targets. A sparc-so
On 7/24/19 8:17 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Committed in r273783 after retesting and including a test for
>> the warning that I had left out of the patch I posted here.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> PS I suspect some of the tests I added might need tweaking on
>> big-endian systems. I'll deal with them tomorr
On 7/24/19 8:17 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Committed in r273783 after retesting and including a test for
>> the warning that I had left out of the patch I posted here.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> PS I suspect some of the tests I added might need tweaking on
>> big-endian systems. I'll deal with them tomorr
On 7/24/19 8:39 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 7/24/19 8:17 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Committed in r273783 after retesting and including a test for
the warning that I had left out of the patch I posted here.
Martin
PS I suspect some of the tests I added might need tweaking on
big-endian systems. I'll d
On 7/25/19 1:42 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 7/24/19 8:39 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 7/24/19 8:17 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Committed in r273783 after retesting and including a test for
the warning that I had left out of the patch I posted here.
Martin
PS I suspect some o
10 matches
Mail list logo