Hi Jakub,
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:19:52PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Unlikely: there's barely any development on the Solaris assemblers these
>> days, though I prefer to xfail tests if possible to get notified if they
>> suddenly start to work for some reason.
>
> Ok.
here's what I've inst
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:19:52PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Unlikely: there's barely any development on the Solaris assemblers these
> days, though I prefer to xfail tests if possible to get notified if they
> suddenly start to work for some reason.
Ok.
Jakub
Hi Jakub,
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:12:27PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91298-2.c (test for excess errors)
>>
>> It only allows letters, digits, '_' and '.' in identifiers:
>> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E37838_01/html/E61064/eqbsx.html#XALRMeoqjw
>
> So, no way to emi
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:12:27PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91298-2.c (test for excess errors)
>
> It only allows letters, digits, '_' and '.' in identifiers:
> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E37838_01/html/E61064/eqbsx.html#XALRMeoqjw
So, no way to emit other letters in i
Hi Jakub,
> In AT&T syntax leading $ is special, so if we have identifiers that start
> with dollar, we usually fail to assemble it (or assemble incorrectly).
> As mentioned in the PR, what works is wrapping the identifiers inside of
> parens, like:
> movl$($a), %eax
> leaq($a)
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 1:30 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> In AT&T syntax leading $ is special, so if we have identifiers that start
> with dollar, we usually fail to assemble it (or assemble incorrectly).
> As mentioned in the PR, what works is wrapping the identifiers inside of
> parens, l
Hi!
In AT&T syntax leading $ is special, so if we have identifiers that start
with dollar, we usually fail to assemble it (or assemble incorrectly).
As mentioned in the PR, what works is wrapping the identifiers inside of
parens, like:
movl$($a), %eax
leaq($a)(,%rdi,4), %ra
