Re: [PATCH] i386: Separate costs of pseudo registers from hard registers

> > > -- H.J. > > > > > > 0001-i386-Separate-costs-of-pseudo-registers-from-hard-re.patch > > > > From 79834daf252cecfc3ee51acd864641d2cdaff733 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: "H.J. Lu" > > Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:30:16 -0700 > >

Re: [PATCH] i386: Separate costs of pseudo registers from hard registers

gisters-from-hard-re.patch > > From 79834daf252cecfc3ee51acd864641d2cdaff733 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: "H.J. Lu" > Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:30:16 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] i386: Separate costs of pseudo registers from hard registers > > processor_costs has costs of RTL expressions w

PING^1 [PATCH] i386: Separate costs of pseudo registers from hard registers

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 2:57 PM H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:16 AM H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:37 AM Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > > > > > > > Currently, costs of moves are also used for costs of RTL > > > >

[PATCH] i386: Separate costs of pseudo registers from hard registers

ase which is > > why add_stmt special-cases strided loads/stores adding some > > pessimization. > > > > > I would say that for integer constructs it is a common case that things > > > needs to be moved from integer unit to SSE. > > > > Is it? For S