On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 12:42 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:00 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> We can use const reference of struct ix86_frame to avoid making a local
>>> copy of ix86_frame. ix86_expand_epilogue makes a local copy
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:00 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> We can use const reference of struct ix86_frame to avoid making a local
>> copy of ix86_frame. ix86_expand_epilogue makes a local copy of struct
>> ix86_frame and uses the reg_save_offset fi
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:00 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> We can use const reference of struct ix86_frame to avoid making a local
> copy of ix86_frame. ix86_expand_epilogue makes a local copy of struct
> ix86_frame and uses the reg_save_offset field as a local variable. This
> patch uses a separate loca
We can use const reference of struct ix86_frame to avoid making a local
copy of ix86_frame. ix86_expand_epilogue makes a local copy of struct
ix86_frame and uses the reg_save_offset field as a local variable. This
patch uses a separate local variable for reg_save_offset.
Tested on x86-64 with ad
