Hi,
with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can
be local functions without any callers. This is something that IPA-CP
does not like because its propagation verifier checks that local
functions do not end up with TOP in their lattices. Therefore there
is an assert check
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can
> be local functions without any callers.
Did you check why? Can't we fix that?
> This is something that IPA-CP
> does not like because its propagation verif
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 14 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can
>> be local functions without any callers.
>
> Did you check why? Can't we fix that?
no, I have not check
> Hi,
>
> with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can
> be local functions without any callers. This is something that IPA-CP
If there is possibility to trigger a local function without callers, I
think one can also make two local functions calling each other but with
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18 2022, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can
>> be local functions without any callers. This is something that IPA-CP
>
> If there is possibility to trigger a local function without callers, I
> think one can also