[PATCH] ipa-cp: Fix assert triggering with -fno-toplevel-reorder (PR 106260)

Hi, with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can be local functions without any callers. This is something that IPA-CP does not like because its propagation verifier checks that local functions do not end up with TOP in their lattices. Therefore there is an assert check

Re: [PATCH] ipa-cp: Fix assert triggering with -fno-toplevel-reorder (PR 106260)

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06 PM Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can > be local functions without any callers. Did you check why? Can't we fix that? > This is something that IPA-CP > does not like because its propagation verif

Re: [PATCH] ipa-cp: Fix assert triggering with -fno-toplevel-reorder (PR 106260)

Hi, On Thu, Jul 14 2022, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06 PM Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can >> be local functions without any callers. > > Did you check why? Can't we fix that? no, I have not check

Re: [PATCH] ipa-cp: Fix assert triggering with -fno-toplevel-reorder (PR 106260)

> Hi, > > with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can > be local functions without any callers. This is something that IPA-CP If there is possibility to trigger a local function without callers, I think one can also make two local functions calling each other but with

Re: [PATCH] ipa-cp: Fix assert triggering with -fno-toplevel-reorder (PR 106260)

Hi, On Mon, Jul 18 2022, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can >> be local functions without any callers. This is something that IPA-CP > > If there is possibility to trigger a local function without callers, I > think one can also