[PATCH] libgccjit.h: Make the macro definition for testing gcc_jit_context_new_bitcast correctly available.

2022-07-23 Thread Vibhav Pant via Gcc-patches
-- Vibhav Pant vibh...@gmail.com GPG: 7ED1 D48C 513C A024 BE3A 785F E3FB 28CB 6AB5 9598 From 13f7b010962d57a9a133b657838727486e4241c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vibhav Pant Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:18:05 +0530 Subject: [[PATCH] libgccjit.h: Make the macro definition for testing

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit.h: Make the macro definition for testing gcc_jit_context_new_bitcast correctly available.

2022-07-25 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
On Sat, 2022-07-23 at 13:31 +0530, Vibhav Pant via Jit wrote: > The macro definition for LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc-jit_context_new_bitcast > was earlier located in the documentation comment for > gcc_jit_context_new_bitcast, making it unavailable to code that > consumed libgccjit.h. This patch moves the d

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit.h: Make the macro definition for testing gcc_jit_context_new_bitcast correctly available.

2022-07-30 Thread Vibhav Pant via Gcc-patches
I don't have push rights to the repo, so this would need to be applied manually. Thanks, Vibhav On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 4:48 AM David Malcolm wrote: > > On Sat, 2022-07-23 at 13:31 +0530, Vibhav Pant via Jit wrote: > > The macro definition for LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc-jit_context_new_bitcast > > was

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit.h: Make the macro definition for testing gcc_jit_context_new_bitcast correctly available.

2022-08-09 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 19:18 +0530, Vibhav Pant wrote: > I don't have push rights to the repo, so this would need to be > applied manually. I've gone ahead and pushed your fix to trunk (for GCC 13) as r13-2004- g9385cd9c74cf66. I plan to also push it to the gcc 12 branch shortly (for gcc 12.2) T

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit.h: Make the macro definition for testing gcc_jit_context_new_bitcast correctly available.

2022-08-09 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 11:39 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 19:18 +0530, Vibhav Pant wrote: > > I don't have push rights to the repo, so this would need to be > > applied manually. > > I've gone ahead and pushed your fix to trunk (for GCC 13) as r13- > 2004- > g9385cd9c74cf66.