Ping.
On 07/07/15 14:17, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Try to re-use the previous team to avoid the use of malloc() and free()
in the normal case where number of threads is the same. Avoid
superfluous destruction and initialization of team synchronization
objects.
Using the microbenchmark posted
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 08:32:33AM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Ping.
Space in gomp_thread is precious, that is a TLS variable, and you want
to only handle the non-nested case only anyway, so why don't you
just try to use
if (thr-thread_pool)
{
struct gomp_thread *last_team =
On 13/07/15 09:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 08:32:33AM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Ping.
Space in gomp_thread is precious, that is a TLS variable, and you want
to only handle the non-nested case only anyway, so why don't you
just try to use
if (thr-thread_pool)
{
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 09:26:10AM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/07/15 09:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 08:32:33AM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Ping.
Space in gomp_thread is precious, that is a TLS variable, and you want
to only handle the non-nested case only
Try to re-use the previous team to avoid the use of malloc() and free()
in the normal case where number of threads is the same. Avoid
superfluous destruction and initialization of team synchronization
objects.
Using the microbenchmark posted here
