On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:16 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/9/20 6:32 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:09 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/8/20 4:53 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for the report. It's caused by fact that LLVM switch in
> >>>
On 6/9/20 6:32 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:09 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/8/20 4:53 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
Thank you for the report. It's caused by fact that LLVM switch in 4d474e078ac7
to c++14. So that I suggest to use gnu++14.
Patch can bootstrap on
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:09 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/8/20 4:53 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Thank you for the report. It's caused by fact that LLVM switch in
> > 4d474e078ac7
> > to c++14. So that I suggest to use gnu++14.
> >
> > Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and
On 6/8/20 4:53 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
Thank you for the report. It's caused by fact that LLVM switch in 4d474e078ac7
to c++14. So that I suggest to use gnu++14.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
I also verified that abidiff is equal for all
the patch if there are no objections.
Thanks,
Martin
>From d5cc8547786f296931c93c63b3431c65ed8e7d3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 16:04:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libsanitizer: use gnu++14
libsanitizer/ChangeLog:
* asan/Makefile.am: Replace gnu++11 with