On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 10:30, Alexandre Oliva via Libstdc++ <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> ISTM that rtems is missing some of the math.h functions expected by
> libstdc++, but also that even those that are present are not visible in
> namespace ::std::, where the macros reasonably expect to
On Friday, 2 June 2023 11:30:17 CEST Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I also noticed the same test is failing on rtems6 (at least with gcc
> 11). AFAICT the problem is that _GLIBCXX_SIMD_MATH_CALL* macros in
> simd_math.h expect the named functions to be in std::, but I get such
> errors as:
>
>
On Jun 2, 2023, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> I'm looking at that function again, also in light of recent improvements wrt.
> code-gen, and will remove that assumption, that long long is vectorizable.
Thanks, I'll leave that to you, then.
I also noticed the same test is failing on rtems6 (at
Hello Alexandre,
On Friday, 2 June 2023 10:32:40 CEST Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 26, 2023, Matthias Kretz via Libstdc++ wrote:
> > OK for master and all backports (after 11.4 is done)?
> > tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> >
> > *
Hello, Matthias,
On May 26, 2023, Matthias Kretz via Libstdc++ wrote:
> OK for master and all backports (after 11.4 is done)?
> tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> * testsuite/experimental/simd/pr109822_cast_functions.cc: New
> test.
This testcase fails to
On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 12:11, Matthias Kretz via Libstdc++ <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> OK for master and all backports (after 11.4 is done)?
>
OK
>
> tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>
> --- 8<
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz
>
>
OK for master and all backports (after 11.4 is done)?
tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--- 8<
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/109822
* include/experimental/bits/simd.h (to_native): Use int NTTP
