On 02/08/17 00:05 +0900, Katsuhiko Nishimra wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:53:42PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This __has_bultin check only exists for Clang, so should be replaced
by the correct __is_identifier check, not left there in addition to
it.
I see. Actually I've guessed so, and
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:53:42PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This __has_bultin check only exists for Clang, so should be replaced
> by the correct __is_identifier check, not left there in addition to
> it.
I see. Actually I've guessed so, and thank you for clarifying it.
I'm attaching a repl
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Tim Song wrote:
>
> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#checks-for-type-trait-primitives
> seems to suggest using __has_extension instead.
Hmm, that doesn't work. Oh well.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 27/07/17 16:27 +0900, Katsuhiko Nishimra wrote:
>>
>> From 56c4a18d0d8c8ce7aa1239880138775e4db06645 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Katsuhiko Nishimra
>> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:03:54 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Support st
On 27/07/17 16:27 +0900, Katsuhiko Nishimra wrote:
From 56c4a18d0d8c8ce7aa1239880138775e4db06645 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Katsuhiko Nishimra
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:03:54 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Support std::is_aggregate on clang++
Currently, libstdc++ tries to detect __is_agg
>From 56c4a18d0d8c8ce7aa1239880138775e4db06645 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Katsuhiko Nishimra
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:03:54 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Support std::is_aggregate on clang++
Currently, libstdc++ tries to detect __is_aggregate built-in macro using
__has_builtin, but this