On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 21:43, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 18:42, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:26, Christophe Lyon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > As discussed in PR104167 (comments #8 and below), and PR111238, using
> > > -Wl,-gc-sections in the libstdc++
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 18:42, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:26, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > As discussed in PR104167 (comments #8 and below), and PR111238, using
> > -Wl,-gc-sections in the libstdc++ testsuite for arm-eabi
> > (cross-toolchain) avoids link failures
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:05:19 +0200
> > Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:25:45 +0200
> > From: Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
> > However, this would hide the fact that libstdc++ somehow forces the
> > user to use -Wl,-gc-sections to avoid undefined references to
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023, 18:43 Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++, <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:26, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > As discussed in PR104167 (comments #8 and below), and PR111238, using
> > -Wl,-gc-sections in the libstdc++ testsuite for arm-eabi
> >
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:26, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> As discussed in PR104167 (comments #8 and below), and PR111238, using
> -Wl,-gc-sections in the libstdc++ testsuite for arm-eabi
> (cross-toolchain) avoids link failures for a few tests:
>
> 27_io/filesystem/path/108636.cc
I think this one
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:25:45 +0200
> From: Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
> As discussed in PR104167 (comments #8 and below), and PR111238, using
> -Wl,-gc-sections in the libstdc++ testsuite for arm-eabi
> (cross-toolchain) avoids link failures for a few tests:
>
>
GLIBCXX_CHECK_LINKER_FEATURES for cross-builds
(PR111238)
As discussed in PR104167 (comments #8 and below), and PR111238, using
-Wl,-gc-sections in the libstdc++ testsuite for arm-eabi
(cross-toolchain) avoids link failures for a few tests:
27_io/filesystem/path/108636.cc
std/time/clock/gps/1.cc
std/time
