On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 19:32, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 3:33 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
>
> Ping.
Huh, I thought I'd already approved this ... sorry.
OK for trunk, with the -ftemplate-depth test change too.
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 3:33 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
Ping.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> The recursively defined constraints on _Variadic_union's user-defined
> destructor (necessary for maintaining trivial destructibility of the
> variant iff
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> The recursively defined constraints on _Variadic_union's user-defined
> destructor (necessary for maintaining trivial destructibility of the
> variant iff all of its
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
The recursively defined constraints on _Variadic_union's user-defined
destructor (necessary for maintaining trivial destructibility of the
variant iff all of its alternatives are) effectively require a template
instantiation
