On 13/08/18 19:57, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/08/18 13:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/08/18 12:55 +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 09/08/18 10:08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Yes please, on trunk and 7 and 8. It's better to use the standard
aligned_alloc if available.
but the newlib
On 13/08/18 13:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/08/18 12:55 +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 09/08/18 10:08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/08/18 06:56 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:22 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely
On 13/08/18 12:55 +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 09/08/18 10:08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/08/18 06:56 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:22 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Aha, so newlib was using memalign
On 09/08/18 10:08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/08/18 06:56 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:22 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Aha, so newlib was using memalign previously:
@@ -53,20 +54,24 @@ aligned_alloc
Hi Jonathan,
> Committed to trunk, gcc-8-branch and gcc-7-branch.
>
> Rainer, please let me know if this still works on Solaris 10, thanks.
I ran i386-pc-solaris2.1[01] and sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01] bootstraps
last night: no regressions.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
On 09/08/18 06:56 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:22 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Aha, so newlib was using memalign previously:
@@ -53,20 +54,24 @@ aligned_alloc (std::size_t al, std::size_t sz)
#else
extern "C"
On 08/08/18 16:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:22 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Aha, so newlib was using memalign previously:
@@ -53,20 +54,24 @@ aligned_alloc (std::size_t al, std::size_t sz)
#else
extern "C" void *memalign(std::size_t boundary, std::size_t
On 08/08/18 15:46 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 15:33 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:22 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Aha, so newlib was using memalign previously:
@@ -53,20 +54,24 @@ aligned_alloc (std::size_t al, std::size_t sz)
#else
extern
On 08/08/18 15:33 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:22 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Aha, so newlib was using memalign previously:
@@ -53,20 +54,24 @@ aligned_alloc (std::size_t al, std::size_t sz)
#else
extern "C" void *memalign(std::size_t boundary,
On 08/08/18 16:22 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Aha, so newlib was using memalign previously:
@@ -53,20 +54,24 @@ aligned_alloc (std::size_t al, std::size_t sz)
#else
extern "C" void *memalign(std::size_t boundary, std::size_t size);
#endif
-#define aligned_alloc
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Aha, so newlib was using memalign previously:
>
> @@ -53,20 +54,24 @@ aligned_alloc (std::size_t al, std::size_t sz)
> #else
> extern "C" void *memalign(std::size_t boundary, std::size_t size);
> #endif
> -#define aligned_alloc memalign
Yes, exactly ... this commit
On 08/08/18 16:04 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/08/18 16:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 15:57 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 10:52 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
While building for Newlib, some configure checks must be hard coded.
The
On 08/08/18 16:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 15:57 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 10:52 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>While building for Newlib, some configure checks must be hard coded.
>The aligned_alloc() is supported since 2015 in Newlib.
>
On 08/08/18 15:57 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 10:52 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>While building for Newlib, some configure checks must be hard coded.
>The aligned_alloc() is supported since 2015 in Newlib.
>
>libstdc++-v3
>
>PR target/85904
>*
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 08/08/18 10:52 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >While building for Newlib, some configure checks must be hard coded.
> >The aligned_alloc() is supported since 2015 in Newlib.
> >
> >libstdc++-v3
> >
> > PR target/85904
> > * configure.ac): Define
On 08/08/18 13:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/08/18 10:52 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
While building for Newlib, some configure checks must be hard coded.
The aligned_alloc() is supported since 2015 in Newlib.
libstdc++-v3
PR target/85904
* configure.ac): Define HAVE_ALIGNED_ALLOC
On 08/08/18 10:52 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
While building for Newlib, some configure checks must be hard coded.
The aligned_alloc() is supported since 2015 in Newlib.
libstdc++-v3
PR target/85904
* configure.ac): Define HAVE_ALIGNED_ALLOC if building for
There's a stray
While building for Newlib, some configure checks must be hard coded.
The aligned_alloc() is supported since 2015 in Newlib.
libstdc++-v3
PR target/85904
* configure.ac): Define HAVE_ALIGNED_ALLOC if building for
Newlib.
* configure: Regnerate.
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
