On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> > > In particular, FIELD_DECLs have a size, but they have no RTL associated
> > > with them. And LABEL_DECLs have RTL, but no size.
>
> Blaeh. So far about nice clean ideas :) One hacky idea: change my
> proposal to this:
>
> de
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > I had occasion to try this today; this inheritance structure doesn't
> > work. The truncated inheritance tree looks like:
> >
> > * decl_common
> > * field_decl
> > * const_decl
> > * decl_with_rtl
> > * label_decl
> > * result_decl
>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:55:33PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
>> I have a preference in having just one DECL_RTL field for conceptual
>> reasons:
>>
>> Most DECLs are actually objects (there are some prominent exceptions, but
>> those always
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:55:33PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> I have a preference in having just one DECL_RTL field for conceptual
> reasons:
>
> Most DECLs are actually objects (there are some prominent exceptions, but
> those always would be better described with something like NAMED_ENTITY,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:55:33PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> I have a preference in having just one DECL_RTL field for conceptual
> reasons:
>
> Most DECLs are actually objects (there are some prominent exceptions, but
> those always would be better described with something like NAMED_ENTITY,
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:52:00PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > Have you looked into maybe putting the CODE_LABEL for a LABEL_DECL in
> > an on-the-side structure (hash table, whatever)? It looks like it is
> > only used during expansion of SWITC
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:52:00PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Have you looked into maybe putting the CODE_LABEL for a LABEL_DECL in
> an on-the-side structure (hash table, whatever)? It looks like it is
> only used during expansion of SWITCH statements.
I haven't, though it'd be easy enough o
Hi Nathan,
Have you looked into maybe putting the CODE_LABEL for a LABEL_DECL in
an on-the-side structure (hash table, whatever)? It looks like it is
only used during expansion of SWITCH statements.
Ciao!
Steven
This patch does just what $SUBJECT suggests: pushes down the DECL_RTL
field into LABEL_DECL. In this way, LABEL_DECL can inherit from
tree_decl_common instead of tree_decl_with_rtl.
I realize this looks like pure code shuffling; the reason for doing this
is that I want to split tree_decl_common i
