On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:54:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Trevor Saunders
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:58:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Trev
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:54:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:58:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Trevor Saunders
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:58:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Trevor Saunders
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, wro
Il 08/11/2013 10:37, Richard Biener ha scritto:
> /* If we have a gate, combine the properties that we could have with
> and without the pass being examined. */
> if (pass->has_gate)
> properties &= new_properties;
> else
> properties = new_properties;
>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:58:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, wrote:
> >> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, wrote:
>> > From: Trevor Saunders
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the
>> > has_gat
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate
> > and
> > has_execute flags on pass_data. It turns out not much,
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate
> > and
> > has_execute flags on pass_data. It turns out not much,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, wrote:
> From: Trevor Saunders
>
> Hi,
>
> This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate
> and
> has_execute flags on pass_data. It turns out not much, but I wanted
> confirmation this part is ok before I go deal with all the places
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:30:16AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/07/13 09:00, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
> >From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> > This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate
> > and
> >has_execute flags on pass_data. It turns out not much, bu
On 11/07/13 09:00, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate and
has_execute flags on pass_data. It turns out not much, but I wanted
confirmation this part is ok before I go deal with all the places that
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate and
has_execute flags on pass_data. It turns out not much, but I wanted
confirmation this part is ok before I go deal with all the places that
initialize the fields.
I bootstrapped this part o
12 matches
Mail list logo
