> Am 28.11.2023 um 09:36 schrieb Jakub Jelinek :
>
> Hi!
>
> When looking around, I've noticed we have a similar simplification
> for parity (with ^ rather than +). Note, unlike the popcount one,
> this one doesn't check for INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) (which rules out
> vector simplification), s
Hi!
When looking around, I've noticed we have a similar simplification
for parity (with ^ rather than +). Note, unlike the popcount one,
this one doesn't check for INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) (which rules out
vector simplification), so I've used the old handling for types_match and
otherwise do it onl
