On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> > When trying to associate (v + INT_MAX) + INT_MAX we are using
> > the TREE_OVERFLOW bit to check for correctness. That isn't
> > working for VECTOR_CSTs and it can't in general when one considers
> > VL
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> When trying to associate (v + INT_MAX) + INT_MAX we are using
> the TREE_OVERFLOW bit to check for correctness. That isn't
> working for VECTOR_CSTs and it can't in general when one considers
> VL vectors. It looks like it should work for COMPLEX_CSTs
When trying to associate (v + INT_MAX) + INT_MAX we are using
the TREE_OVERFLOW bit to check for correctness. That isn't
working for VECTOR_CSTs and it can't in general when one considers
VL vectors. It looks like it should work for COMPLEX_CSTs but
I didn't try to single out _Complex int in
