On Tue, 19 Mar 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 03:47:37PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > The following fixes bogus truncation of a value-range for an int128
> > array index when computing the maximum extent for a variable array
> > reference. Instead of possibly slowing
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 03:47:37PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following fixes bogus truncation of a value-range for an int128
> array index when computing the maximum extent for a variable array
> reference. Instead of possibly slowing things down by using
> widest_int the following makes
The following fixes bogus truncation of a value-range for an int128
array index when computing the maximum extent for a variable array
reference. Instead of possibly slowing things down by using
widest_int the following makes sure the range bounds fit within
the constraints offset_int were
