On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 12:01 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> As I mentioned in the description of the access warning pass when
> I submitted it in July(*), I planned to change the -Wstringop-xxx
> code in the pass to run on the GIMPLE IL instead of on trees in
> builtins.c (and elsewher
As I mentioned in the description of the access warning pass when
I submitted it in July(*), I planned to change the -Wstringop-xxx
code in the pass to run on the GIMPLE IL instead of on trees in
builtins.c (and elsewhere). The attached patch implements this
change along with moving more warning