On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 08:21:56AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> LGTM.
Thank you.
> On 8/30/19 2:31 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > Hello, any comments on this?
> >
> > If nothing I will commit in a few days.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:44:04PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> >> When c
LGTM.
On 8/30/19 2:31 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> Hello, any comments on this?
>
> If nothing I will commit in a few days.
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:44:04PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
>> When compiling glibc we found that the GOT register was being allocated
>> r9 when the instruction was
Hello, any comments on this?
If nothing I will commit in a few days.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:44:04PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> When compiling glibc we found that the GOT register was being allocated
> r9 when the instruction was still set_got_tmp. That caused set_got to
> clobber r9. We
When compiling glibc we found that the GOT register was being allocated
r9 when the instruction was still set_got_tmp. That caused set_got to
clobber r9. We cannot simply say set_got_tmp clobbers r9 as this is the
reason for having the temporary set_got_tmp.
Fix by using a register class constra
