Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-18 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On 11/17/21 20:27, Martin Sebor wrote: On 11/17/21 12:21 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 11/17/21 11:31 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 11/16/21 20:11, Martin Sebor wrote: On 11/16/21 1:23 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/23/21 19:06, Martin Sebor wrote: On 10/4/21 3:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-17 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 11/17/21 12:21 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 11/17/21 11:31 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 11/16/21 20:11, Martin Sebor wrote: On 11/16/21 1:23 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/23/21 19:06, Martin Sebor wrote: On 10/4/21 3:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/4/21 14:42, Martin Sebor wrote: While

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-17 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 11/17/21 11:31 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 11/16/21 20:11, Martin Sebor wrote: On 11/16/21 1:23 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/23/21 19:06, Martin Sebor wrote: On 10/4/21 3:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/4/21 14:42, Martin Sebor wrote: While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-17 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On 11/16/21 20:11, Martin Sebor wrote: On 11/16/21 1:23 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/23/21 19:06, Martin Sebor wrote: On 10/4/21 3:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/4/21 14:42, Martin Sebor wrote: While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR PR102103) I came across a 2007

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-16 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 11/16/21 1:23 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/23/21 19:06, Martin Sebor wrote: On 10/4/21 3:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/4/21 14:42, Martin Sebor wrote: While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR PR102103) I came across a 2007 problem report about GCC 4 having stopped

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-16 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On 10/23/21 19:06, Martin Sebor wrote: On 10/4/21 3:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/4/21 14:42, Martin Sebor wrote: While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR PR102103) I came across a 2007 problem report about GCC 4 having stopped warning for using the address of inline

PING 2 [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-15 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/582415.html On 11/7/21 4:31 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/582415.html On 10/23/21 5:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 10/4/21 3:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/4/21 14:42, Martin

PING [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-07 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/582415.html On 10/23/21 5:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 10/4/21 3:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/4/21 14:42, Martin Sebor wrote: While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR PR102103) I came across a 2007 problem

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-02 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:51:16PM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > On 10/4/21 4:39 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:43 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > > > > > > While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR > > > PR102103) I came

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-11-02 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 10/4/21 4:39 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:43 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR PR102103) I came across a 2007 problem report about GCC 4 having stopped warning for using the address of inline functions

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-10-23 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 10/4/21 3:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/4/21 14:42, Martin Sebor wrote: While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR PR102103) I came across a 2007 problem report about GCC 4 having stopped warning for using the address of inline functions in equality comparisons with

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-10-04 Thread Eric Gallager via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:43 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > > While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR > PR102103) I came across a 2007 problem report about GCC 4 having > stopped warning for using the address of inline functions in > equality comparisons with null.

Re: [PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-10-04 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On 10/4/21 14:42, Martin Sebor wrote: While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR PR102103) I came across a 2007 problem report about GCC 4 having stopped warning for using the address of inline functions in equality comparisons with null.  With inline functions being

[PATCH] restore ancient -Waddress for weak symbols [PR33925]

2021-10-04 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
While resolving the recent -Waddress enhancement request (PR PR102103) I came across a 2007 problem report about GCC 4 having stopped warning for using the address of inline functions in equality comparisons with null. With inline functions being commonplace in C++ this seems like an important