On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 4:07 AM Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> on 2024/4/8 18:47, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:22 AM Kewen.Lin wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As the comments in PR88309 show, there are two oversights
> >> in rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin that pass align in bytes to
> >>
on 2024/4/8 18:47, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:22 AM Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the comments in PR88309 show, there are two oversights
>> in rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin that pass align in bytes to
>> build_aligned_type but which actually requires align in
>> bits, it
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:22 AM Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As the comments in PR88309 show, there are two oversights
> in rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin that pass align in bytes to
> build_aligned_type but which actually requires align in
> bits, it causes unexpected ICE or hanging in function
>
Hi,
As the comments in PR88309 show, there are two oversights
in rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin that pass align in bytes to
build_aligned_type but which actually requires align in
bits, it causes unexpected ICE or hanging in function
is_miss_rate_acceptable due to zero align_unit value.
This patch
