Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Testcases for rl*i*

On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 02:36:54PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 1799 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 1799 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldic 415 >

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Testcases for rl*i*

FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 1799 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 1799 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldic 415 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+sldi

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Testcases for rl*i*

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > These testcases test that we generate the expected code for all of the > rl*i* instructions, that is, rotate-and-mask and rotate-and-mask-insert > for immediate rotation counts. All the testcases do rotate,

[PATCH] rs6000: Testcases for rl*i*

These testcases test that we generate the expected code for all of the rl*i* instructions, that is, rotate-and-mask and rotate-and-mask-insert for immediate rotation counts. All the testcases do rotate, shift left, as well as shift right; if that results in an instruction that does not exist the