On 10/26/2016 07:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:13:06PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/26/2016 03:05 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
2) We do not necessarily have all notes yet, if the port lets dwarf2cfi
create notes by itself. Most (or even all?) ports do.
Hmm
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:13:06PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 03:05 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >2) We do not necessarily have all notes yet, if the port lets dwarf2cfi
> >create notes by itself. Most (or even all?) ports do.
>
> Hmm. Are you recording the insns in prologue_c
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:13:06PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 03:05 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >2) We do not necessarily have all notes yet, if the port lets dwarf2cfi
> >create notes by itself. Most (or even all?) ports do.
>
> Hmm. Are you recording the insns in prologue_c
On 10/26/2016 03:05 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
2) We do not necessarily have all notes yet, if the port lets dwarf2cfi
create notes by itself. Most (or even all?) ports do.
Hmm. Are you recording the insns in prologue_contains etc.? You could
add dependencies for a prologue insn following
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:30:04PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 01:19 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >Separate shrink-wrapping creates this not-all-that-smart code because
> >the profile is quite messed up, and spread_components isn't super smart
> >to begin with. I'll have a patch
On 10/26/2016 01:19 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Separate shrink-wrapping creates this not-all-that-smart code because
the profile is quite messed up, and spread_components isn't super smart
to begin with. I'll have a patch for that soon, but even with it (and
also without separate shrink-wrapp
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:48:54PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/25/2016 06:57 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >This patch makes scheduling not reorder any RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P insns
> >(relative to each other), to fix PR78029. I originally was a bit worried
> >that this would degrade code qu
On 10/25/2016 06:57 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
This patch makes scheduling not reorder any RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P insns
(relative to each other), to fix PR78029. I originally was a bit worried
that this would degrade code quality, but it seems to even improve it:
more other insns are scheduled b
This patch makes scheduling not reorder any RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P insns
(relative to each other), to fix PR78029. I originally was a bit worried
that this would degrade code quality, but it seems to even improve it:
more other insns are scheduled between the prologue insns.
The problem in PR78029:
