Sorry the slow reply. I'm not well versed on the all AArch32 combinations
but it looks good to me.
Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches writes:
> The previous change to this testcase missed the fact that the data may
> be accessed via an anchor, depending on the optimization level,
> leading to
ping?
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 14:02, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 11:01, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > The previous change to this testcase missed the fact that the data may
> > be accessed via an anchor, depending on the optimization level,
> > leading to false
ping?
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 11:01, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> The previous change to this testcase missed the fact that the data may
> be accessed via an anchor, depending on the optimization level,
> leading to false failures.
>
> This patch restricts matching to upper16:lower16 followed by
>
The previous change to this testcase missed the fact that the data may
be accessed via an anchor, depending on the optimization level,
leading to false failures.
This patch restricts matching to upper16:lower16 followed by
non-spaces, followed by +4 (in f4) or +320 (in f5).
Using '.*' instead of
