On May 10, 2022, at 6:31 PM, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> LGTM, that's only added a new option for RISC-V and won't affect all
> other targets, so I assume I can approve that.
Yes. Usual and customary for ports.
On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:31:37 PDT (-0700), Kito Cheng wrote:
LGTM, that's only added a new option for RISC-V and won't affect all
other targets, so I assume I can approve that.
I always forget what the rules are, but someone recently reminded me and
yes that's the case. I committed this.
LGTM, that's only added a new option for RISC-V and won't affect all
other targets, so I assume I can approve that.
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:27 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> Similar to 37e65643d3e ("testsuite/101269: fix testcase when used with
> -m32"), RISC-V needs to be told not to put symbols
Similar to 37e65643d3e ("testsuite/101269: fix testcase when used with
-m32"), RISC-V needs to be told not to put symbols in the
sdata/srodata/sbss sections.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
* debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c: Don't use small data on RISC-V.
---
