On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 07:24:50PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:46:30PM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > The testcases pr59833.c and pr61441.c check whether signaling NaNs as
> > input to some operation result in quiet NaNs. Without -fsignaling-nans
> > this is not
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:46:30PM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> The testcases pr59833.c and pr61441.c check whether signaling NaNs as
> input to some operation result in quiet NaNs. Without -fsignaling-nans
> this is not guaranteed to happen. So, this patch add this option to
> these
On 02/16/2017 10:46 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
The testcases pr59833.c and pr61441.c check whether signaling NaNs as
input to some operation result in quiet NaNs. Without -fsignaling-nans
this is not guaranteed to happen. So, this patch add this option to
these testcases.
Tested on
The testcases pr59833.c and pr61441.c check whether signaling NaNs as
input to some operation result in quiet NaNs. Without -fsignaling-nans
this is not guaranteed to happen. So, this patch add this option to
these testcases.
Tested on powerpc64-linux {-m32,-m64}, on aarch64-linux, and on