On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 10:15:31AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 4/18/19 3:23 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > If we don't HONOR_NANS we should not try to use any unordered
> > comparison results. Best case those will just be optimized away;
> > realistically, they ICE. For example, the rs6000
On 4/18/19 3:23 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> If we don't HONOR_NANS we should not try to use any unordered
> comparison results. Best case those will just be optimized away;
> realistically, they ICE. For example, the rs6000 backend has some
> code that specifically checks we never do this.
>
If we don't HONOR_NANS we should not try to use any unordered
comparison results. Best case those will just be optimized away;
realistically, they ICE. For example, the rs6000 backend has some
code that specifically checks we never do this.
This patch fixes it. Bootstrapped and tested on
