Instead of using TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2) directly, use
component_ref_field_offset instead, which does scaling for us. The
function also substitutes PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs, which is probably what we
want anyway but I'm not sure if it's relevant for tree-object-size.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optim
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 4:32 AM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
> Instead of using TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2) directly, use
> component_ref_field_offset instead, which does scaling for us. The
> function also substitutes PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs, which is probably what we
> want anyway but I'm not sure if it's
> OK. PLACEHOLDER_EXPR are only relevant pre simplification.
I presume you mean "pre gimplification" here?
--
Eric Botcazou
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:05 PM Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > OK. PLACEHOLDER_EXPR are only relevant pre simplification.
>
> I presume you mean "pre gimplification" here?
Eh, yes. Spell-checkers ...
> --
> Eric Botcazou
>
>
>
On 2023-01-25 22:32, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
Instead of using TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2) directly, use
component_ref_field_offset instead, which does scaling for us. The
function also substitutes PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs, which is probably what we
want anyway but I'm not sure if it's relevant for tree
