Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

> Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Richard Biener wrote: > >> > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> > >> The enhancement to address PR 109849 contained an

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

Hi, On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Richard Biener wrote: >> > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi, >> > >> >> > >> The enhancement to address PR 109849 contained an importsnt thinko, >> >

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

> Am 28.11.2023 um 18:38 schrieb Jan Hubicka : > >  >> >> >> Am 28.11.2023 um 17:59 schrieb Jan Hubicka : >>> >>>  > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: >> >>

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

> > > > Am 28.11.2023 um 17:59 schrieb Jan Hubicka : > > > >  > >> > >>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The enhancement to address PR 109849

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

> Am 28.11.2023 um 17:59 schrieb Jan Hubicka : > >  >> >>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Richard Biener wrote: On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > The enhancement to address PR 109849 contained an importsnt thin

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Richard Biener wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> The enhancement to address PR 109849 contained an importsnt thinko, > > >> and that any reference that is passed to a functio

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> The enhancement to address PR 109849 contained an importsnt thinko, > >> and that any reference that is passed to a function and does not > >

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

On Tue, Nov 28 2023, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The enhancement to address PR 109849 contained an importsnt thinko, >> and that any reference that is passed to a function and does not >> escape, must also not happen to be aliased by the return

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > The enhancement to address PR 109849 contained an importsnt thinko, > and that any reference that is passed to a function and does not > escape, must also not happen to be aliased by the return value of the > function. This has quickly transpir

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:16 AM Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > The enhancement to address PR 109849 contained an importsnt thinko, > and that any reference that is passed to a function and does not > escape, must also not happen to be aliased by the return value of the > function. This has qui

[PATCH] tree-sra: Avoid returns of references to SRA candidates

Hi, The enhancement to address PR 109849 contained an importsnt thinko, and that any reference that is passed to a function and does not escape, must also not happen to be aliased by the return value of the function. This has quickly transpired as bugs PR 112711 and PR 112721. Just as IPA-modref