> On Feb 28, 2023, at 4:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 07:19:40PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
>> Understood.
>> So, your patch fixed this bug, and then [0] arrays are instrumented by
>> default with this patch.
>>
>>> Well, it would complain about
>>> struct S { int a;
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 07:19:40PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Understood.
> So, your patch fixed this bug, and then [0] arrays are instrumented by
> default with this patch.
>
> > Well, it would complain about
> > struct S { int a; int b[0]; int c; } s;
> > ... &s.b[1] ...
> > for C++, but not f
> On Feb 28, 2023, at 12:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 04:13:28PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>> On Feb 28, 2023, at 3:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
>>> wrote:
>>> I think -fstrict-flex-arrays* options can be considered as language
>>> mode changing options, by d
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 04:13:28PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 2023, at 3:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > I think -fstrict-flex-arrays* options can be considered as language
> > mode changing options, by default flexible member-like arrays are
> > handled like flexi
Hi, Jakub,
Thanks a lot for fixing this issue.
I have several questions in below:
> On Feb 28, 2023, at 3:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> I think -fstrict-flex-arrays* options can be considered as language
> mode changing options, by default flexible member-like arrays are
> ha
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:02:47AM +, Richard Biener wrote:
> > While this isn't really a regression, the -fstrict-flex-arrays*
> > option is new in GCC 13 and so I think we should make -fsanitize=bounds
> > play with it well from the beginning.
> >
> > The current behavior is that -fsanitize=
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While this isn't really a regression, the -fstrict-flex-arrays*
> option is new in GCC 13 and so I think we should make -fsanitize=bounds
> play with it well from the beginning.
>
> The current behavior is that -fsanitize=bounds considers all t
Hi!
While this isn't really a regression, the -fstrict-flex-arrays*
option is new in GCC 13 and so I think we should make -fsanitize=bounds
play with it well from the beginning.
The current behavior is that -fsanitize=bounds considers all trailing
arrays as flexible member-like arrays and both -f
