On 12/7/23 03:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 09:36:22AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
So, one way to fix the LRA issue would be just to use
lra_insn_recog_data_len = index * 3U / 2;
if (lra_insn_recog_data_len <= index)
lra_insn_recog_data_len = index + 1;
basically
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:12:39AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > 2023-12-07 Jakub Jelinek
> > >
> > > PR middle-end/112411
> > > * params.opt (-param=min-nondebug-insn-uid=): Add
> > > IntegerRange(0, 1073741824).
> > > * lra.cc (check_an
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:12:39AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > 2023-12-07 Jakub Jelinek
> >
> > PR middle-end/112411
> > * params.opt (-param=min-nondebug-insn-uid=): Add
> > IntegerRange(0, 1073741824).
> > * lra.cc (check_and_expand_insn_recog_data): Use 3U rather than 3
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 09:36:22AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > So, one way to fix the LRA issue would be just to use
> > lra_insn_recog_data_len = index * 3U / 2;
> > if (lra_insn_recog_data_len <= index)
> > lra_insn_recog_data_len = index +
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 09:36:22AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> So, one way to fix the LRA issue would be just to use
> lra_insn_recog_data_len = index * 3U / 2;
> if (lra_insn_recog_data_len <= index)
> lra_insn_recog_data_len = index + 1;
> basically do what vec.cc does. I thought we ca
