Re: [PATCH] v2: Add targetm.libm_function_max_error

2023-04-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 12:29:58PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches writes: > > Hi! > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:34:59AM +, Richard Biener wrote: > >> OK. As said the patch itself looks good to me, let's go ahead. We > >> have plenty of time to backtrack

Re: [PATCH] v2: Add targetm.libm_function_max_error

2023-04-28 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches writes: > Hi! > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:34:59AM +, Richard Biener wrote: >> OK. As said the patch itself looks good to me, let's go ahead. We >> have plenty of time to backtrack until GCC 14. > > Thanks. Unfortunately when I started using it, I've

[PATCH] v2: Add targetm.libm_function_max_error

2023-04-27 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
Hi! On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:34:59AM +, Richard Biener wrote: > OK. As said the patch itself looks good to me, let's go ahead. We > have plenty of time to backtrack until GCC 14. Thanks. Unfortunately when I started using it, I've discovered that the CASE_CFN_xxx_ALL macros don't include