Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-12 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc-patches
> On Jan 12, 2023, at 9:40 AM, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 09:17:31AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: >>> On Jan 12, 2023, at 4:50 AM, Segher Boessenkool >>> wrote: >>> I mean general_operand accepts that sp thing you saw. But your >>> constraints do not? (I don't kn

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-12 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 09:17:31AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2023, at 4:50 AM, Segher Boessenkool > > wrote: > > I mean general_operand accepts that sp thing you saw. But your > > constraints do not? (I don't know your target well, maybe this isn't > > true). Things like this sh

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-12 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc-patches
> On Jan 12, 2023, at 4:50 AM, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:07:47PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: >>> On Jan 11, 2023, at 2:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool >>> wrote: >>> I would say your predicates are way too lenient here (general_operand), >>> but this needs more info

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-12 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:07:47PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2023, at 2:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool > > wrote: > > I would say your predicates are way too lenient here (general_operand), > > but this needs more info. A testcase to reproduce the problem, to > > start with :-) > > I'

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 8:44 AM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:09 PM Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 07:39:29PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > > Like if they cannot even build their target libraries aka their build > > > will fail. It would be

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:09 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 07:39:29PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > Like if they cannot even build their target libraries aka their build will > > fail. It would be nice to identify those and, say, make at least -mlra > > available t

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc-patches
> On Jan 11, 2023, at 2:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:42:22PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: >> Or, as in my case, because building with LRA as the default triggers an ICE >> that I don't understand. I posted a note to the GCC list about what I saw, >> but ha

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:42:22PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > Or, as in my case, because building with LRA as the default triggers an ICE > that I don't understand. I posted a note to the GCC list about what I saw, > but have received no reaction.

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 07:39:29PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > Like if they cannot even build their target libraries aka their build will > fail. It would be nice to identify those and, say, make at least -mlra > available to all ports that currently do not have a way to enable LRA? It is up

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc-patches
> On Jan 11, 2023, at 1:32 PM, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:27:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >>> Am 11.01.2023 um 16:17 schrieb Segher Boessenkool >>> : Note this is more info for port maintainers not for users and changes.html is for users. >>> >

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> Am 11.01.2023 um 19:34 schrieb Segher Boessenkool > : > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:27:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: Am 11.01.2023 um 16:17 schrieb Segher Boessenkool : > Note this is more info for port maintainers not for users and > changes.html is for users. >>>

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:27:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > Am 11.01.2023 um 16:17 schrieb Segher Boessenkool > > : > >> Note this is more info for port maintainers not for users and > >> changes.html is for users. > > > > And users will notice some ports will have to be removed, because

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> Am 11.01.2023 um 16:17 schrieb Segher Boessenkool > : > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 03:34:45PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:22 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: Happy new year everyone. Is this patch

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 03:34:45PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:22 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > Happy new year everyone. > > > > > > Is this patch okay to commit? > > > > From a wwwdocs perspective, yes. > > > > Ar

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:22 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Happy new year everyone. > > > > Is this patch okay to commit? > > From a wwwdocs perspective, yes. > > Are you also *asking* from an architectural/"strategic" perspective, > or simply *info

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-11 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Happy new year everyone. > > Is this patch okay to commit? >From a wwwdocs perspective, yes. Are you also *asking* from an architectural/"strategic" perspective, or simply *informing*? :-) The former I cannot approve, the latter I certainly can

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-05 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 02:54:04PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2023, at 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool > > wrote: > > +Support for old reload is deprecated. It will be removed in a > > future > > + release. Every target will always use LRA from then on. > Does this mean that t

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-05 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc-patches
Does this mean that targets that have an option to use LRA or not should now default to LRA? Some currently default to old reload. paul > On Jan 5, 2023, at 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > Hi! > > Happy new year everyone. > > Is this patch okay to commit? > > > Segher >

[PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated

2023-01-05 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! Happy new year everyone. Is this patch okay to commit? Segher --- htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html index 3876ad77543a..954469cdcfa4 100644 --- a/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html +++ b/htdocs/