On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 7:17 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:34:01AM -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > > * gcc.target/i386/pr93492-3.c: Likewise.
> > > > * gcc.target/i386/pr93492-5.c: Likewise.
>
> These tests FAIL on i686-linux.
> E.g. in the
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:34:01AM -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > * gcc.target/i386/pr93492-3.c: Likewise.
> > > * gcc.target/i386/pr93492-5.c: Likewise.
These tests FAIL on i686-linux.
E.g. in the first one I see
.file "pr93492-3.c"
.text
On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 04:55 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Currently patchable area is at the wrong place. It is placed immediately
> after function label, before both .cfi_startproc and ENDBR. This patch
> adds UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for pseudo patchable area instruction and
> changes ENDBR insertion
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 4:22 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 4:55 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > Currently patchable area is at the wrong place. It is placed immediately
> > after function label, before both .cfi_startproc and ENDBR. This patch
> > adds UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 4:55 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> Currently patchable area is at the wrong place. It is placed immediately
> after function label, before both .cfi_startproc and ENDBR. This patch
> adds UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for pseudo patchable area instruction and
> changes ENDBR insertion
Currently patchable area is at the wrong place. It is placed immediately
after function label, before both .cfi_startproc and ENDBR. This patch
adds UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for pseudo patchable area instruction and
changes ENDBR insertion pass to also insert patchable area instruction.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 06:10:49PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:02 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 10:35 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > Define TARGET_ASM_PRINT_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY to make sure that the
> > > ENDBR are emitted before the patch area. When
