On 13 July 2017 at 10:46, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 24 June 2017 at 19:23, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just doing an update of the patch series, rebased against trunk, and
>> applied changes as requested by every comment so far.
>>
>> Notes on changes have been made on each patch where applicab
On 24 June 2017 at 19:23, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just doing an update of the patch series, rebased against trunk, and
> applied changes as requested by every comment so far.
>
> Notes on changes have been made on each patch where applicable.
>
Hi,
So what would be the best way forward with
On 06/13/2017 02:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 13 June 2017 at 01:22, Mike Stump wrote:
>>> On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
I'm not sure who this is a question to really, but how much value is
t
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 13 June 2017 at 01:22, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure who this is a question to really, but how much value is
>>> there in reviewing the other patches?
>>
>>> Maybe peop
On 13 June 2017 at 01:22, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure who this is a question to really, but how much value is
>> there in reviewing the other patches?
>
>> Maybe people who know the
>> frontend interface well could comment on th
On 12 June 2017 at 20:34, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> [Disclaimer: I can't approve any of this :-)]
>
> Iain Buclaw writes:
>> 001 - The front-end (DMD) language implementation and license.
>> 002 - The front-end (GDC) implementation.
>> 003 - The front-end (GDC) changelogs (here be dragons)
On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> I'm not sure who this is a question to really, but how much value is
> there in reviewing the other patches?
> Maybe people who know the
> frontend interface well could comment on that part, but would anyone
> here be able to do a meani
[Disclaimer: I can't approve any of this :-)]
Iain Buclaw writes:
> 001 - The front-end (DMD) language implementation and license.
> 002 - The front-end (GDC) implementation.
> 003 - The front-end (GDC) changelogs (here be dragons).
> 004 - The front-end (GDC) config, makefile, and manpag
On 29 May 2017 at 22:57, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> The upstream DMD compiler that comprises all components of the
>> standalone part is now implemented in D programming language itself.
>> However here GDC is still using the C++ implementation, it is a future
>> goal to switch to being a self-hosted
> The upstream DMD compiler that comprises all components of the
> standalone part is now implemented in D programming language itself.
> However here GDC is still using the C++ implementation, it is a future
> goal to switch to being a self-hosted compiler minus the GCC binding
> interface (simila
On 28 May 2017 at 22:31, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 28 May 2017 at 15:30, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Iain Buclaw (13):
>> 001 - The front-end (DMD) language implementation and license.
>> 002 - The front-end (GDC) implementation.
>> 003 - The front-end (GDC) changelogs (here be dragons
On 28 May 2017 at 15:30, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> ---
>
> Iain Buclaw (13):
> 001 - The front-end (DMD) language implementation and license.
> 002 - The front-end (GDC) implementation.
> 003 - The front-end (GDC) changelogs (here be dragons).
> 004 - The front-end (GDC) config, makefile, and
12 matches
Mail list logo